In re Oceanside Estates, Inc.

E.D. New York

In re Oceanside Estates, Inc.

84 F. Supp. 114, 1948 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3081

CourtDistrict Court, E.D. New York

DecidedMay 21, 1948

DocketNo. 47322

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 84 F. Supp. 114 (In re Oceanside Estates, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, E.D. New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Oceanside Estates, Inc., 84 F. Supp. 114, 1948 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3081 (E.D.N.Y. 1948).

Pincite

Opinion

ABRUZZO, District Judge.

This is a motion for an order to set aside and reverse Referee Warner’s order of March 29, 1948, while the debtor in a companion motion moves to dismiss the petition seeking to set aside the Referee’s order.

The movant seeking to set aside the Referee’s order entered a judgment in favor of Milton S. Bergman and Norma Bergman in the Supreme Court of Nassau County on October 27, 1947, in the sum'of $3,565 at 3:26 p. m. On the same date, a petition for arrangement was filed in the above entitled action under Chapter XI, Section 322, of the Bankruptcy Act, 11 U.S.C.A. § 722, in this Court at 9:18 a. m. The lien against the property of the debtor in possession, therefore, was entered after the petition for arrangement was filed and must be nullified. Thus, when bankruptcy was adjudicated, the sequestration reached all property of the debtor and became operative from the institution of the proceeding, to wit, at 9:18 a. m. on October 27, 1947. State Bank of Chicago v. Cox, 7 Cir., 143 F. 91; In re O’Brien, 2 Cir., 78 F.2d 715; Mueller v. Nugent, 184 U.S. 1, 22 S.Ct. 269, 46 L.Ed. 405.

The Referee’s order was proper. I, therefore, deny the motion for an order setting aside and reversing the Referee’s order of March 29, 1948, and grant the motion to dismiss on the merits the petition to review the Referee’s order.

Submit order o,n two days notice.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ABRUZZO, District Judge.

This is a motion for an order to set aside and reverse Referee Warner’s order of March 29, 1948, while the debtor in a companion motion moves to dismiss the petition seeking to set aside the Referee’s order.

The movant seeking to set aside the Referee’s order entered a judgment in favor of Milton S. Bergman and Norma Bergman in the Supreme Court of Nassau County on October 27, 1947, in the sum'of $3,565 at 3:26 p. m. On the same date, a petition for arrangement was filed in the above entitled action under Chapter XI, Section 322, of the Bankruptcy Act, 11 U.S.C.A. § 722, in this Court at 9:18 a. m. The lien against the property of the debtor in possession, therefore, was entered after the petition for arrangement was filed and must be nullified. Thus, when bankruptcy was adjudicated, the sequestration reached all property of the debtor and became operative from the institution of the proceeding, to wit, at 9:18 a. m. on October 27, 1947. State Bank of Chicago v. Cox, 7 Cir., 143 F. 91; In re O’Brien, 2 Cir., 78 F.2d 715; Mueller v. Nugent, 184 U.S. 1, 22 S.Ct. 269, 46 L.Ed. 405.

The Referee’s order was proper. I, therefore, deny the motion for an order setting aside and reversing the Referee’s order of March 29, 1948, and grant the motion to dismiss on the merits the petition to review the Referee’s order.

Submit order o,n two days notice.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

84 F. Supp. 114, 1948 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3081, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-oceanside-estates-inc-nyed-1948.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack