In re Obringer

880 A.2d 1211, 584 Pa. 77
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided June 24, 2005·No. No. 379 Disciplinary Docket No. 3·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 24th day of June 2005, upon consideration of the Report and Recommendations of the Disciplinary Board [78] dated March 24, 2005, the Petition for Reinstatement is GRANTED.

Pursuant to Rule 218(e), Pa.R.D.E., petitioner is directed to pay the expenses incurred by the Board in the investigation and processing of the Petition for Reinstatement.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Obringer, 880 A.2d 1211, 584 Pa. 77 (Pa. 2005).

880 A.2d 1211 (In re Obringer) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.