In re Objection to the Nomination of Mancuso

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

In re Objection to the Nomination of Mancuso

657 A.2d 136, 1995 Pa. Commw. LEXIS 164, 1995 WL 153641

CourtCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedApril 7, 1995

DocketNo. 792 C.D. 1995

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 657 A.2d 136 (In re Objection to the Nomination of Mancuso) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Objection to the Nomination of Mancuso, 657 A.2d 136, 1995 Pa. Commw. LEXIS 164, 1995 WL 153641 (Pa. Ct. App. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

KELTON, Senior Judge.

Dorothy C. Kelly (Objector) appeals from the March 22, 1995 order of the Court of Common Pleas of Fayette County, dismissing Objector’s Objection to the Nomination Petition of Joseph Mancuso (Candidate).

Candidate timely filed his nomination petition for re-election to the Office of School Director of the Connellsville School District for both the Democratic and Republican primaries. Objector timely filed her Objection, alleging that Candidate is not qualified to hold the office of school director because he has been convicted of infamous crimes, including the first degree felonies of burglary, robbery, and aggravated assault. Objector requested that the trial court rule the Candidate constitutionally unfit to hold the office of school director and order the Fayette County Election Bureau to reject his nomination petition and not permit his name to appear on the ballot.

Candidate filed a motion to dismiss Objector’s objection, alleging, among other arguments, that Candidate lacks standing to object to his nomination petition. Following a hearing, the trial court granted Candidate’s motion to dismiss. The court ruled that, under In re Williams, 155 Pa.Commonwealth Ct. 494, 625 A.2d 1279 (1993), because Objector is a Democrat, she has no standing to challenge Candidate’s Republican nomination petition. Additionally, the court ruled that because Objector and Candidate reside in different regions of the same school district, she cannot vote for Candidate in either the primary or general election; therefore, Objector has no standing to challenge either of Candidate’s nomination petitions.

Objector appeals from the trial court’s order. However, after hearing oral argument and without deciding the issues raised on appeal, we conclude that this court does not have jurisdiction to hear Objector’s appeal. See In re Elliot, — Pa.Commonwealth Ct. -, 657 A.2d 132 (1995), and cases cited therein.

ORDER

AND NOW, April 7, 1995, upon our motion, jurisdiction is hereby transferred to the Pennsylvania Supreme Court, pursuant to 42 Pa.C.S. § 722(2).

SMITH, J., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

KELTON, Senior Judge.

Dorothy C. Kelly (Objector) appeals from the March 22, 1995 order of the Court of Common Pleas of Fayette County, dismissing Objector’s Objection to the Nomination Petition of Joseph Mancuso (Candidate).

Candidate timely filed his nomination petition for re-election to the Office of School Director of the Connellsville School District for both the Democratic and Republican primaries. Objector timely filed her Objection, alleging that Candidate is not qualified to hold the office of school director because he has been convicted of infamous crimes, including the first degree felonies of burglary, robbery, and aggravated assault. Objector requested that the trial court rule the Candidate constitutionally unfit to hold the office of school director and order the Fayette County Election Bureau to reject his nomination petition and not permit his name to appear on the ballot.

Candidate filed a motion to dismiss Objector’s objection, alleging, among other arguments, that Candidate lacks standing to object to his nomination petition. Following a hearing, the trial court granted Candidate’s motion to dismiss. The court ruled that, under In re Williams, 155 Pa.Commonwealth Ct. 494, 625 A.2d 1279 (1993), because Objector is a Democrat, she has no standing to challenge Candidate’s Republican nomination petition. Additionally, the court ruled that because Objector and Candidate reside in different regions of the same school district, she cannot vote for Candidate in either the primary or general election; therefore, Objector has no standing to challenge either of Candidate’s nomination petitions.

Objector appeals from the trial court’s order. However, after hearing oral argument and without deciding the issues raised on appeal, we conclude that this court does not have jurisdiction to hear Objector’s appeal. See In re Elliot, — Pa.Commonwealth Ct. -, 657 A.2d 132 (1995), and cases cited therein.

ORDER

AND NOW, April 7, 1995, upon our motion, jurisdiction is hereby transferred to the Pennsylvania Supreme Court, pursuant to 42 Pa.C.S. § 722(2).

SMITH, J., dissents.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

657 A.2d 136, 1995 Pa. Commw. LEXIS 164, 1995 WL 153641, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-objection-to-the-nomination-of-mancuso-pacommwct-1995.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack