Home/Ohio Supreme Court/In re Objection to Order of Bd. of Commrs. on the Unauthorized Practice of Law

In re Objection to Order of Bd. of Commrs. on the Unauthorized Practice of Law

701 N.E.2d 382, 83 Ohio St. 3d 1476, 1998 Ohio LEXIS 3330
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedNovember 5, 1998
Docket98-2267
StatusPublished

This text of 701 N.E.2d 382 (In re Objection to Order of Bd. of Commrs. on the Unauthorized Practice of Law) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Objection to Order of Bd. of Commrs. on the Unauthorized Practice of Law, 701 N.E.2d 382, 83 Ohio St. 3d 1476, 1998 Ohio LEXIS 3330 (Ohio 1998).

Opinion

This case was opened upon the filing of an objection to an order of the Board of Commissioners on the Unauthorized Practice of Law. Whereas movant Mark Szezepinski’s objection does not contain proof of service as required by S.Ct.Prac.R. XIV(2),

IT IS ORDERED by the court, sua sponte, that movant’s objection be¡ and hereby is, stricken, and this case be, and hereby is, dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
701 N.E.2d 382, 83 Ohio St. 3d 1476, 1998 Ohio LEXIS 3330, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-objection-to-order-of-bd-of-commrs-on-the-unauthorized-practice-of-ohio-1998.