In re Objection to Nomination Petitions of Solomon

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

In re Objection to Nomination Petitions of Solomon

134 A.3d 52, 635 Pa. 213, 2016 WL 1340365, 2016 Pa. LEXIS 720

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided April 5, 2016·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 6th day of April, 2016, the Order of the Commonwealth Court is hereby affirmed in part and vacated in part. The portion of the order denying the Petition to Set Aside the Nomination Petition of Jared Solomon is affirmed. The portion of the order imposing costs against Mark Cohen is vacated and remanded. See In re Nomination Petition of Farnese, 609 Pa. 543, 17 A.3d 357 (2011). On remand, we direct that the Commonwealth Court’s final order assessing costs shall reference costs by category and the amounts assessed, and shall include a rationale for the imposition of such costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 6th day of April, 2016, the Order of the Commonwealth Court is hereby affirmed in part and vacated in part. The portion of the order denying the Petition to Set Aside the Nomination Petition of Jared Solomon is affirmed. The portion of the order imposing costs against Mark Cohen is vacated and remanded. See In re Nomination Petition of Farnese, 609 Pa. 543, 17 A.3d 357 (2011). On remand, we direct that the Commonwealth Court’s final order assessing costs shall reference costs by category and the amounts assessed, and shall include a rationale for the imposition of such costs.

In re Objection to Nomination Petitions of Solomon, 134 A.3d 52, 635 Pa. 213, 2016 WL 1340365, 2016 Pa. LEXIS 720 (Pa. 2016).

Pincite

134 A.3d 52 (In re Objection to Nomination Petitions of Solomon) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related