In re O.B.

2022 Ohio 2914
Ohio Court of Appeals·Decided August 22, 2022·No. CA2022-04-019 CA2022-04-021 CA2022-04-022·Published

Opinion

[Cite as In re O.B., 2022-Ohio-2914.]

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO

WARREN COUNTY

IN RE: :

O.B., et al. : CASE NOS. CA2022-04-019 CA2022-04-021 : CA2022-04-022

: DECISION 8/22/2022 :

:

APPEAL FROM WARREN COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS JUVENILE DIVISION Case Nos. 21-D000060; 21-D000061; 21-D000062

Tibbs Law Office, LLC, and Sarah E. Michel, for appellant.

Ostrowski Law Firm, Co., L.P.A., and Andrea G. Ostrowski, for Mother.

Aaron Aldridge, for custodians.

Andrew J. Brenner, guardian ad litem.

David Fornshell, Warren County Prosecuting Attorney, and Michelle Belknap, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for Warren County Children Services.

Per Curiam.

{¶1} This cause came on to be considered upon a notice of appeal filed by

appellant, the transcript of the docket and journal entries, the transcript of proceedings and Warren CA2022-04-019 CA2022-04-021 CA2022-04-022

original papers from the Warren County Court of Common Pleas, Juvenile Division, and

upon the brief filed by appellant's counsel.

{¶2} Appellant's counsel has filed a brief with this court pursuant to Anders v.

California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396 (1967), which (1) indicates that a careful review of

the record from the proceedings below fails to disclose any errors by the trial court

prejudicial to the rights of appellant upon which an assignment of error may be predicated;

(2) lists three potential errors "that might arguably support the appeal," Anders, at 744, 87

S.Ct. at 1400; (3) requests that this court review the record independently to determine

whether the proceedings are free from prejudicial error and without infringement of

appellant's constitutional rights; (4) requests permission to withdraw as counsel for

appellant on the basis that the appeal is wholly frivolous; and (5) certifies that a copy of both

the brief and motion to withdraw have been served upon appellant.

{¶3} Having allowed appellant sufficient time to respond, and no response having

been received, we have accordingly examined the record and find no error prejudicial to

appellant's rights in the proceedings in the trial court. The motion of counsel for appellant

requesting to withdraw as counsel is granted, and this appeal is dismissed for the reason

that it is wholly frivolous.

M. POWELL, P.J., S. POWELL and BYRNE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re O.B., 2022 Ohio 2914 (Ohio Ct. App. 2022).

2022 Ohio 2914 (In re O.B.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)