In re Nyece M.

83 A.D.3d 718, 919 N.Y.S.2d 876
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedApril 5, 2011
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 83 A.D.3d 718 (In re Nyece M.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Nyece M., 83 A.D.3d 718, 919 N.Y.S.2d 876 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2011).

Opinion

In a child protective proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 10, the father appeals, as limited by his brief, from stated portions of an order of disposition of the Family Court, Rings County (Grosvenor, J.), dated April 16, 2010, which, after separate fact-finding and dispositional hearings, found that he neglected the child Nyece M. and, inter alia, directed the father’s continued exclusion from the family home until he completes an anger management program.

Ordered that the order of disposition is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.

The Family Court’s finding that the father neglected the subject child by using excessive corporal punishment was supported by a preponderance of the evidence (see Family Ct Act § 1012 [f] [i] [B]; see also Matter of Maria Raquel L., 36 AD3d 425 [2007]; Matter of Joshua B., 28 AD3d 759 [2006]; Matter of Joseph O., 28 AD3d 562 [2006]; Matter of Alysha M., 24 AD3d 255 [2005]; Matter of Sheneika V., 20 AD3d 541 [2005]; Matter of Jonathan W., 17 AD3d 374 [2005]; Matter of Johannah QQ., 266 AD2d 769 [1999]; Matter of Suffolk County Dept. of Social Servs. v Nicole S., 266 AD2d 556 [1999]).

The Family Court’s order of disposition, which, inter alia, directed the father’s continued exclusion from the home until after he completes an anger management program, was in the child’s best interest (see Family Ct Act § 1052 [b] [ii]; § 1056 [1] [a], [h]; see also Matter of Kenneth L., 209 AD2d 352 [1994]). Skelos, J.P., Eng, Austin and Cohen, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re Jamarra S.
85 A.D.3d 803 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
83 A.D.3d 718, 919 N.Y.S.2d 876, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-nyece-m-nyappdiv-2011.