In re Nudelman

City of New York Municipal Court

In re Nudelman

196 Misc. 1058, 95 N.Y.S.2d 783, 1949 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 3184

CourtCity of New York Municipal Court

DecidedDecember 19, 1949

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 196 Misc. 1058 (In re Nudelman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering City of New York Municipal Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Nudelman, 196 Misc. 1058, 95 N.Y.S.2d 783, 1949 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 3184 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1949).

Pincite

Opinion

Evans, J.

This court is not concerned as to whether the nature of the competition between Newman Catering Corp., Newman Bros. Caterers Inc., or Newman Caterers on the one hand [1059]*1059and Julie Newman Kosher Caterers, on the other hand is fair or unfair. But it must concern itself with seeing to it that sworn statements made to it, as a basis for its orders, are honest and truthful. The order of October 26, 1949, was signed, upon the representation, among others, that petitioner had registered, in the Bronx County Clerk’s office, the trade name of “ Julie Newman Kosher Caterers ”. The petitioner apparently thought that the fact of registering the name was important in inducing the court to sign the order. That fact was relevant and material, although it is possible that the order might have been signed, if the petitioner had remained silent on that subject. That representation to the court was false, and if not intentionally false, quite careless. I can find no reason for mitigating the falsity or recklessness of the petition, nor lending encouragement to similar conduct in applications for ex parte orders. Nor can it be said that the moving party has no such interest in the order as to be prevented from calling the attention of the court to the imposition put upon it. I think any citizen may properly call its attention to such fact. Motion granted. Order of October 26, 1949, vacated and set aside.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Evans, J.

This court is not concerned as to whether the nature of the competition between Newman Catering Corp., Newman Bros. Caterers Inc., or Newman Caterers on the one hand [1059]*1059and Julie Newman Kosher Caterers, on the other hand is fair or unfair. But it must concern itself with seeing to it that sworn statements made to it, as a basis for its orders, are honest and truthful. The order of October 26, 1949, was signed, upon the representation, among others, that petitioner had registered, in the Bronx County Clerk’s office, the trade name of “ Julie Newman Kosher Caterers ”. The petitioner apparently thought that the fact of registering the name was important in inducing the court to sign the order. That fact was relevant and material, although it is possible that the order might have been signed, if the petitioner had remained silent on that subject. That representation to the court was false, and if not intentionally false, quite careless. I can find no reason for mitigating the falsity or recklessness of the petition, nor lending encouragement to similar conduct in applications for ex parte orders. Nor can it be said that the moving party has no such interest in the order as to be prevented from calling the attention of the court to the imposition put upon it. I think any citizen may properly call its attention to such fact. Motion granted. Order of October 26, 1949, vacated and set aside.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

196 Misc. 1058, 95 N.Y.S.2d 783, 1949 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 3184, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-nudelman-nynyccityct-1949.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack