In Re NTE Mobility Partners Segments 3 LLC, NTE Mobility Partners LLC, NTE Mobility Partners Segments 3 Holding LLC, NTE Mobility Partners Holding LLC, Cintra NTE LLC, Cintra NTE Mobility Partners Segment 3 LLC, FedEx Express Corp. F/K/A FedEx Ground Package System, Inc., Cintra US Services LLC v. the State of Texas
This text of In Re NTE Mobility Partners Segments 3 LLC, NTE Mobility Partners LLC, NTE Mobility Partners Segments 3 Holding LLC, NTE Mobility Partners Holding LLC, Cintra NTE LLC, Cintra NTE Mobility Partners Segment 3 LLC, FedEx Express Corp. F/K/A FedEx Ground Package System, Inc., Cintra US Services LLC v. the State of Texas (In Re NTE Mobility Partners Segments 3 LLC, NTE Mobility Partners LLC, NTE Mobility Partners Segments 3 Holding LLC, NTE Mobility Partners Holding LLC, Cintra NTE LLC, Cintra NTE Mobility Partners Segment 3 LLC, FedEx Express Corp. F/K/A FedEx Ground Package System, Inc., Cintra US Services LLC v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth ___________________________ No. 02-24-00460-CV ___________________________
IN RE NTE MOBILITY PARTNERS SEGMENTS 3 LLC, NTE MOBILITY PARTNERS LLC, NTE MOBILITY PARTNERS SEGMENTS 3 HOLDING LLC, NTE MOBILITY PARTNERS HOLDING LLC, CINTRA NTE LLC, CINTRA NTE MOBILITY PARTNERS SEGMENT 3 LLC, FEDEX EXPRESS CORPORATION F/K/A FEDEX GROUND PACKAGE SYSTEM, INC., CINTRA US SERVICES LLC, CINTRA HOLDING US CORP. D/B/A CINTRA US CORP., FERROVIAL HOLDING US CORP., CINTRA TEXAS CORP., CINTRA TOLL SERVICES, LLC, ENERGY TRUCKING, LLC, NOLAN TRANSPORTATION GROUP, LLC, SIMON EXPRESS LLC, AND ENVIROTECH SERVICES, INC., Relators
Original Proceeding 153rd District Court of Tarrant County, Texas Trial Court No. 153-000000-22 Before Kerr, J.; Sudderth, C.J.; and Womack, J. Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion
2 MEMORANDUM OPINION
The court has considered the relators’ petition for writ of mandamus, the
response of the real parties in interest, and the relators’ reply and is of the opinion
that relief should be denied. Accordingly, relators’ petition for writ of mandamus is
denied.
Per Curiam
Delivered: November 1, 2024
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
In Re NTE Mobility Partners Segments 3 LLC, NTE Mobility Partners LLC, NTE Mobility Partners Segments 3 Holding LLC, NTE Mobility Partners Holding LLC, Cintra NTE LLC, Cintra NTE Mobility Partners Segment 3 LLC, FedEx Express Corp. F/K/A FedEx Ground Package System, Inc., Cintra US Services LLC v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-nte-mobility-partners-segments-3-llc-nte-mobility-partners-llc-nte-texapp-2024.