In re N.S.

Missouri Court of Appeals

In re N.S.

570 S.W.3d 675

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided April 2, 2019·No. WD 82071·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam

L.S. ("Father") appeals from the judgment terminating his parental rights to his son, N.S. ("Son"). Father contends the evidence was insufficient to support the circuit court's finding that he abandoned Son and that termination of his parental rights was in Son's best interest. For reasons *676explained in a Memorandum provided to the parties, we find no error and affirm the judgment.

AFFIRMED. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam

L.S. ("Father") appeals from the judgment terminating his parental rights to his son, N.S. ("Son"). Father contends the evidence was insufficient to support the circuit court's finding that he abandoned Son and that termination of his parental rights was in Son's best interest. For reasons *676explained in a Memorandum provided to the parties, we find no error and affirm the judgment.

AFFIRMED. Rule 84.16(b).

In re N.S., 570 S.W.3d 675 (Mo. Ct. App. 2019).

Pincite

570 S.W.3d 675 (In re N.S.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.