in Re NRG Energy, Inc.
Opinion
i i i i i i
MEMORANDUM OPINION
No. 04-10-00014-CV
IN RE NRG ENERGY, INC.
Original Mandamus Proceeding1
Sitting: Karen Angelini, Justice Steven C. Hilbig, Justice Marialyn Barnard, Justice
Delivered and Filed: January 20, 2010
PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DENIED
On January 8, 2010, relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus and an emergency motion
for stay. The court has considered relator’s petition for writ of mandamus, the emergency motion,
and real party in interest’s response and is of the opinion that relator is not entitled to the relief
sought. Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus and the emergency motion for stay are
DENIED. See TEX . R. APP . P. 52.8(a).
1 … This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2009-CI-19492, styled The City of San Antonio, Texas, Acting By and Through the City Public Service Board of San Antonio, A Texas Municipal Utility vs. Toshiba Corporation; NRG Energy, Inc., et. al., in the 37th Judicial District Court, B exar County, Texas, the Honorable David A. Berchelmann presiding. However, the order complained of was signed by the Honorable Larry Noll, presiding judge of the 408th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
in Re NRG Energy, Inc. (in Re NRG Energy, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.