in Re: North Dallas Forney Investors, L.L.C.

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided July 11, 2013·No. 05-13-00857-CV·Published

Opinion

Deny Writ and Opinion Filed July 11, 2013

S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05-13-00857-CV

IN RE NORTH DALLAS FORNEY INVESTORS, L.L.C., ET AL., Relators

On Appeal from the 191st Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 11-09384

MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Bridges, Francis, and Lewis Opinion by Justice Bridges Relators contend the trial judge erred by granting a motion to consolidate two cases. The

facts and issues are well known to the parties, so we need not recount them herein. We conclude

relators’ petition does not satisfy the requirements of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure.

See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.3(j); In re Butler, 270 S.W.3d 757, 758 (Tex. App.BDallas 2008, orig.

proceeding). Accordingly, we DENY relators’ petition for writ of mandamus.

/David L. Bridges/ 130857F.P05 DAVID L. BRIDGES JUSTICE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

in Re: North Dallas Forney Investors, L.L.C., (Tex. Ct. App. 2013).

in Re: North Dallas Forney Investors, L.L.C. (in Re: North Dallas Forney Investors, L.L.C.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In Re Butler
270 S.W.3d 757 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2008)