In re Nordmann

Indiana Supreme Court

In re Nordmann

786 N.E.2d 273, 2003 Ind. LEXIS 312, 2003 WL 1872635

CourtIndiana Supreme Court

DecidedApril 8, 2003

DocketNo. 76S00-0302-DI-58

StatusPublished

This text of 786 N.E.2d 273 (In re Nordmann) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Nordmann, 786 N.E.2d 273, 2003 Ind. LEXIS 312, 2003 WL 1872635 (Ind. 2003).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER APPROVING STATEMENT OF CIRCUMSTANCES AND CONDIT-TIONAL AGREEMENT FOR DISCIPLINE .

Pursuant to Ind. Admission and Discipline Rule 28, Section 11, the Indiana Supreme Court Disciplinary Commission and the respondent have submitted for approval a Statement of Circumstances and Conditional Agreement for Discipline stipulating a proposed discipline and agreed facts as summarized below:

[274]*274Facts: The respondent, while employed as a deputy prosecuting attorney in Jay County, Indiana, was arrested in Adams County, Indiana, and charged with operating a vehicle while intoxicated (OWI), a class A misdemeanor, and driving left of center. On May 20, 2002, he pleaded guilty to OWL.

Violations: - The respondent violated Ind.Professional Conduct Rule 8.4(d) by engaging in conduct that was prejudicial to the administration of justice.

Discipline: Public reprimand.

The Court, having considered the submission of the parties, now APPROVES and ORDERS the agreed discipline. Costs of this proceeding are assessed against the respondent. The Clerk is directed to provide notice of this order to all parties as directed by Admis.Disc.R. 23(8)(d).

All Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI