In Re Nomination Petition of Katofsky

872 A.2d 1196, 582 Pa. 557, 2005 Pa. LEXIS 933
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided May 3, 2005·No. Appeal 181 WAL 2005·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 3rd day of May 2005, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal in the above-captioned matter is hereby GRANTED; the order of the Commonwealth Court is REVERSED; and respondent Harold Katofsky’s name is ordered to be STRICKEN from the Municipal Primary Ballot for the Democratic Party nomination for Mayor of the Municipality of Monroeville, Pennsylvania. The Statement of Financial Interest filed in this case failed to include, inter alia, other sources of income which were not ascertainable from the face of the statement. Contrast In re Benninghoff, 578 Pa. 402, 852 A.2d 1182, 1187 (2004) (although candidate failed to expressly name employer and list employer as direct source of income on financial statement, omitted information could be facially obtained from information provided on form as whole because candidate had listed his job title in other portions of statement; thus, candidate “substantially complied” with Act and was permitted to amend statement).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In Re Nomination Petition of Katofsky, 872 A.2d 1196, 582 Pa. 557, 2005 Pa. LEXIS 933 (Pa. 2005).

872 A.2d 1196 (In Re Nomination Petition of Katofsky) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In Re Nomination of Paulmier
937 A.2d 364 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 2007)
In Re Nomination Petition of Littlepage
909 A.2d 1235 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 2006)
In Re Nomination Petition of Carroll
896 A.2d 566 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 2006)