In re Nomination Petition of Farnese
This text of 989 A.2d 1274 (In re Nomination Petition of Farnese) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER
AND NOW, this 8th day of April, 2008, the order of the Commonwealth Court is hereby affirmed in part. The portion of the order denying the Petition to Set Aside the Nomination Petition of Lawrence M. Farnese, Jr., is affirmed. This order is entered without prejudice to the Appellants to seek review of any future order of the Commonwealth Court which may impose a final order of costs. See In re Nomination Paper of Nader, 588 Pa. 450, 461-62, 905 A.2d 450, 457 (2006). We further direct that the Commonwealth Court’s final order assessing costs, if any, shall reference such costs by category and amount assessed and shall include a statement of rationale for the imposition of such costs.
Opinion to follow.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
989 A.2d 1274, 605 Pa. 375, 2008 Pa. LEXIS 2477, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-nomination-petition-of-farnese-pa-2008.