In re Nomination Petition of DeYoung

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

In re Nomination Petition of DeYoung

895 A.2d 546, 586 Pa. 511, 2006 Pa. LEXIS 560

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided April 25, 2006·No. Appeal No. 55 MAP 2006·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 25th day of April, 2006, we REVERSE the Order of the Commonwealth Court and REMAND to the Commonwealth Court for a decision on the merits on Appellee Harry M. Riley’s Petition to Set Aside Nomination Petition. [512]*512Said decision to be rendered within seven (7) days of the date of this Order. A qualified private party has a right to object to a Statement of Financial Interests attached to a Nomination Petition, therefore Appellee has standing to object in this matter. Cf. In re Nomination Petition Bryant, 578 Pa. 421, 852 A.2d 1193 (2004); In re Petition of Cioppa, 533 Pa. 564, 626 A.2d 146 (1993). Opinion to follow. Jurisdiction relinquished.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 25th day of April, 2006, we REVERSE the Order of the Commonwealth Court and REMAND to the Commonwealth Court for a decision on the merits on Appellee Harry M. Riley’s Petition to Set Aside Nomination Petition. [512]*512Said decision to be rendered within seven (7) days of the date of this Order. A qualified private party has a right to object to a Statement of Financial Interests attached to a Nomination Petition, therefore Appellee has standing to object in this matter. Cf. In re Nomination Petition Bryant, 578 Pa. 421, 852 A.2d 1193 (2004); In re Petition of Cioppa, 533 Pa. 564, 626 A.2d 146 (1993). Opinion to follow. Jurisdiction relinquished.

In re Nomination Petition of DeYoung, 895 A.2d 546, 586 Pa. 511, 2006 Pa. LEXIS 560 (Pa. 2006).

Pincite

895 A.2d 546 (In re Nomination Petition of DeYoung) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related