In Re Nomination Petition of Dahlkemper

993 A.2d 868, 605 Pa. 657, 2010 Pa. LEXIS 1042
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided April 12, 2010·No. 7 WAP 2010·Published

Opinion

*658 ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 12th day of May, 2010, the order of the Commonwealth Court is hereby AFFIRMED. Appellant’s Notice of and Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis and Waive Filing Fees for Appeal is GRANTED. Appellant’s Notice of and Motion for Judicial Notice or for Leave for Post-Submission Communication, treated as an Application for Leave to File Post-Submission Communication, is denied as MOOT.

Jurisdiction relinquished.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In Re Nomination Petition of Dahlkemper, 993 A.2d 868, 605 Pa. 657, 2010 Pa. LEXIS 1042 (Pa. 2010).

993 A.2d 868 (In Re Nomination Petition of Dahlkemper) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Prater v. McGarrity
993 A.2d 868 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 2010)