In Re Nomination Papers of Carlineo

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

In Re Nomination Papers of Carlineo

41 A.3d 1280, 615 Pa. 164, 2012 Pa. LEXIS 821

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided April 12, 2012·No. 23 MAP 2012·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 12th day of April, 2012, the Order of the Commonwealth Court is AFFIRMED IN PART, VACATED IN PART, AND REMANDED. The portion of the Order setting aside Appellant’s nomination petition and removing her name from the Republican primary ballot is AFFIRMED. The portion of the Order directing Appellant to bear the cost of the court stenographer is VACATED AND REMANDED, with directions to the Commonwealth Court to reconsider its *165 holding in light of this Court’s decision In re Farnese, 609 Pa. 543,17 A.3d 357 (2011). Jurisdiction relinquished.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 12th day of April, 2012, the Order of the Commonwealth Court is AFFIRMED IN PART, VACATED IN PART, AND REMANDED. The portion of the Order setting aside Appellant’s nomination petition and removing her name from the Republican primary ballot is AFFIRMED. The portion of the Order directing Appellant to bear the cost of the court stenographer is VACATED AND REMANDED, with directions to the Commonwealth Court to reconsider its *165 holding in light of this Court’s decision In re Farnese, 609 Pa. 543,17 A.3d 357 (2011). Jurisdiction relinquished.

In Re Nomination Papers of Carlineo, 41 A.3d 1280, 615 Pa. 164, 2012 Pa. LEXIS 821 (Pa. 2012).

Pincite

41 A.3d 1280 (In Re Nomination Papers of Carlineo) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related