In Re: Nom. of Griffith; Apl. of: Peake

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

In Re: Nom. of Griffith; Apl. of: Peake

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided April 15, 2026·No. 17 EAP 2026·Published

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT

IN RE: NOMINATION PETITION OF SHAUN : No. 17 EAP 2026 GRIFFITH CANDIDATE FOR : PENNSYLVANIA'S 3RD CONGRESSIONAL : DISTRICT, DEMOCRATIC PARTY :

: :

APPEAL OF: THELMA PEAKE :

ORDER

PER CURIAM DECIDED: April 15, 2026

AND NOW, this 15th day of April, 2026, the Application of Appellant Thelma Peake

for Leave to File Brief Nunc Pro Tunc is hereby DENIED. Appellant’s Notice of Appeal is

hereby QUASHED for failure to file a timely brief.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT

IN RE: NOMINATION PETITION OF SHAUN : No. 17 EAP 2026 GRIFFITH CANDIDATE FOR : PENNSYLVANIA'S 3RD CONGRESSIONAL : DISTRICT, DEMOCRATIC PARTY :

: :

APPEAL OF: THELMA PEAKE :

ORDER

PER CURIAM DECIDED: April 15, 2026

AND NOW, this 15th day of April, 2026, the Application of Appellant Thelma Peake

for Leave to File Brief Nunc Pro Tunc is hereby DENIED. Appellant’s Notice of Appeal is

hereby QUASHED for failure to file a timely brief.

In Re: Nom. of Griffith; Apl. of: Peake, (Pa. 2026).

Pincite

In Re: Nom. of Griffith; Apl. of: Peake (In Re: Nom. of Griffith; Apl. of: Peake) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.