In Re Noe Santana v. the State of Texas
This text of In Re Noe Santana v. the State of Texas (In Re Noe Santana v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Petition for Writ of Mandamus Denied and Memorandum Opinion filed October 24, 2024.
In The
Fourteenth Court of Appeals
NO. 14-24-00781-CV
IN RE NOE SANTANA, Relator
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING WRIT OF MANDAMUS 295th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2024-28957
MEMORANDUM OPINION
On October 21, 2024, relator Noe Santana filed a petition for writ of mandamus in this Court. See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 22.221; see also Tex. R. App. P. 52. In the petition, relator asks this Court to compel the Honorable Randy Clapp, presiding judge sitting by assignment of the 295th District Court of Harris County, to vacate all proceedings and orders issued by the trial court, including the dismissal of the case. Relator has not established that he is entitled to mandamus relief. Accordingly, we deny relator’s petition for writ of mandamus.
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Chief Justice Christopher and Justices Wise and Hassan.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
In Re Noe Santana v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-noe-santana-v-the-state-of-texas-texapp-2024.