In Re Noe Santana v. the State of Texas
Opinion
Petition for Writ of Mandamus Denied and Memorandum Opinion filed October 24, 2024.
In The
Fourteenth Court of Appeals
NO. 14-24-00781-CV
IN RE NOE SANTANA, Relator
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING
WRIT OF MANDAMUS
295th District Court Harris County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. 2024-28957
MEMORANDUM OPINION
On October 21, 2024, relator Noe Santana filed a petition for writ of mandamus in this Court. See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 22.221; see also Tex. R. App. P. 52. In the petition, relator asks this Court to compel the Honorable Randy Clapp, presiding judge sitting by assignment of the 295th District Court of Harris County, to vacate all proceedings and orders issued by the trial court, including the dismissal of the case.
Relator has not established that he is entitled to mandamus relief.
Accordingly, we deny relator’s petition for writ of mandamus.
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Chief Justice Christopher and Justices Wise and Hassan.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
In Re Noe Santana v. the State of Texas (In Re Noe Santana v. the State of Texas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.