In Re Noe Santana v. the State of Texas

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided October 24, 2024·No. 14-24-00781-CV·Published

Opinion

Petition for Writ of Mandamus Denied and Memorandum Opinion filed October 24, 2024.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-24-00781-CV

IN RE NOE SANTANA, Relator

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

WRIT OF MANDAMUS

295th District Court Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2024-28957

MEMORANDUM OPINION

On October 21, 2024, relator Noe Santana filed a petition for writ of mandamus in this Court. See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 22.221; see also Tex. R. App. P. 52. In the petition, relator asks this Court to compel the Honorable Randy Clapp, presiding judge sitting by assignment of the 295th District Court of Harris County, to vacate all proceedings and orders issued by the trial court, including the dismissal of the case.

Relator has not established that he is entitled to mandamus relief.

Accordingly, we deny relator’s petition for writ of mandamus.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Christopher and Justices Wise and Hassan.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In Re Noe Santana v. the State of Texas, (Tex. Ct. App. 2024).

In Re Noe Santana v. the State of Texas (In Re Noe Santana v. the State of Texas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.