in Re Noe Pena Gonzalez and Ezequiel Pena

Court of Appeals of Texas

in Re Noe Pena Gonzalez and Ezequiel Pena

DecidedDecember 12, 2018

Docket03-18-00747-CV

StatusPublished

This text of in Re Noe Pena Gonzalez and Ezequiel Pena (in Re Noe Pena Gonzalez and Ezequiel Pena) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

in Re Noe Pena Gonzalez and Ezequiel Pena, (Tex. Ct. App. 2018).

Pincite

Opinion

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-18-00747-CV

In re Noe Pena-Gonzalez and Ezequiel Pena

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING FROM TRAVIS COUNTY

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Relators Noe Pena-Gonzalez and Ezequiel Pena have filed an unopposed motion

to dismiss their petition for writ of mandamus, informing the Court that the State has dismissed

all charges against them, and thus, the issue raised in their petition is now moot. See In re

Kellogg Brown & Root, Inc., 166 S.W.3d 732, 737 (Tex. 2005) (orig. proceeding) (“A case

becomes moot if a controversy ceases to exist between the parties at any stage of the legal

proceedings . . . .”). Therefore, we grant relators’ motion and dismiss the petition for writ of

mandamus as moot.

__________________________________________ Cindy Olson Bourland, Justice

Before Justices Puryear, Goodwin, and Bourland

Filed: December 12, 2018

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI