in Re Noe De Los Santos, Joe Avalos, Rudy Rivera, and Ruben Vaiz

Opinion

NUMBER 13-12-00001-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

IN RE NOE DE LOS SANTOS, JOE AVALOS, RUDY RIVERA, AND RUBEN VAIZ

On Verified Petition for Writ of Injunction and Emergency Motion for Injunctive Relief Pendente Lite.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Rodriguez, Benavides, and Perkes Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion1

Relators, Noe De Los Santos, Joe Avalos, Rudy Rivera, and Ruben Vaiz, filed a verified petition for writ of injunction and emergency motion for injunctive relief pendente lite in the above cause on January 3, 2012, requesting that this Court grant a temporary injunction enjoining the City of Robstown from proceeding with a trial that is set in the 250th District Court of Travis County, Texas. The Court requested and received a

1 See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(d) (“When denying relief, the court may hand down an opinion but is not required to do so.”); TEX. R. APP. P. 47.4 (distinguishing opinions and memorandum opinions).

response to the petition for writ of injunction and emergency motion from the opposing party, the City of Robstown.

The Court, having examined and fully considered the verified petition for writ of injunction and emergency motion for injunctive relief pendente lite, and the response thereto, is of the opinion that relators have not shown themselves entitled to the relief sought. See, e.g., TEX. GOV'T CODE ANN. §§ 1205.025, 1205.061 (West 2000); see also Buckholts Indep. Sch. Dist. v. Glaser, 632 S.W.2d 146, 149 (Tex. 1982); Hotze v. City of Houston, 339 S.W.3d 809, 814 (Tex. App.—Austin 2011, no pet.); Rio Grande Valley Sugar Growers, Inc. v. Attorney Gen. of Tex., 670 S.W.2d 399, 401 (Tex. App.—Austin 1984, writ ref'd n.r.e.).

Accordingly, the petition and emergency motion are DENIED.

PER CURIAM

Delivered and filed the 17th day of January, 2012.