In re N.M.P.

Ohio Supreme Court

In re N.M.P.

118 N.E.3d 257, 2019 Ohio 768, 154 Ohio St. 3d 1519

Ohio Supreme Court·Decided March 6, 2019·No. 2018-1842·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

On review of an order certifying a conflict. The court determines that a conflict exists. The parties are ordered to brief the issue stated at page 4 of the court of appeals' entry filed December 27, 2018: "In a custody proceeding in which an agency has filed for permanent custody pursuant to R.C. 2151.414(B)(1)(d), must the agency establish by clear and convincing evidence that the child has been in the temporary custody of one or more children services agencies for a total of 12 months of a consecutive 22 month period of agency involvement?"

The conflict case is In re K.L., 6th Dist. Lucas Nos. L-17-1201 and L-17-1210, 2017-Ohio-9003.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

On review of an order certifying a conflict. The court determines that a conflict exists. The parties are ordered to brief the issue stated at page 4 of the court of appeals' entry filed December 27, 2018: "In a custody proceeding in which an agency has filed for permanent custody pursuant to R.C. 2151.414(B)(1)(d), must the agency establish by clear and convincing evidence that the child has been in the temporary custody of one or more children services agencies for a total of 12 months of a consecutive 22 month period of agency involvement?"

The conflict case is In re K.L., 6th Dist. Lucas Nos. L-17-1201 and L-17-1210, 2017-Ohio-9003.

In re N.M.P., 118 N.E.3d 257, 2019 Ohio 768, 154 Ohio St. 3d 1519 (Ohio 2019).

Pincite

118 N.E.3d 257 (In re N.M.P.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related