In re Nittolo

Third Circuit

In re Nittolo

305 F. App'x 913

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit

DecidedJanuary 13, 2009

DocketNo. 08-1862

StatusPublished

This text of 305 F. App'x 913 (In re Nittolo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Nittolo, 305 F. App'x 913 (3d Cir. 2009).

Pincite

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

PER CURIAM.

Pro se petitioner Michael Nittolo seeks a writ of mandamus to compel the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey to rule upon his motion to vacate sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. The District Court entered an order denying Nittolo’s § 2255 motion on October 20, 2008, 2008 WL 4661808. Therefore, we will deny the petition for writ of mandamus as moot.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OPINION OF THE COURT

PER CURIAM.

Pro se petitioner Michael Nittolo seeks a writ of mandamus to compel the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey to rule upon his motion to vacate sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. The District Court entered an order denying Nittolo’s § 2255 motion on October 20, 2008, 2008 WL 4661808. Therefore, we will deny the petition for writ of mandamus as moot.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

305 F. App'x 913, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-nittolo-ca3-2009.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack