In re Nilsen

162 A.3d 289, 229 N.J. 333, 2017 WL 2598853, 2017 N.J. LEXIS 640
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedJune 15, 2017
StatusPublished

This text of 162 A.3d 289 (In re Nilsen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Nilsen, 162 A.3d 289, 229 N.J. 333, 2017 WL 2598853, 2017 N.J. LEXIS 640 (N.J. 2017).

Opinion

[334]*334ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 16-222, recommending that as a matter of final discipline pursuant to Rule 1:20-13, TOBIN G. NILSEN, formerly of MINOTOLA, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1982, and who has been temporarily suspended from the practice of law since April 19, 2012, be disbarred based on his conviction in federal and state courts of the use of a computer to entice a minor to engage in sexual activity, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2422(b) and of second-degree attempted child luring, in violation of N.J.S.A. 2C:5-1 and 2C:13-16, conduct that violates RPC 8.4(b)(commission of a criminal act that reflects adversely on the lawyer’s honesty, trustworthiness or fitness as a lawyer);

And TOBIN G. NILSEN having been ordered to show cause why he should not be disbarred or otherwise disciplined, and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that TOBIN G. NILSEN be disbarred, effective immediately, and that his name be stricken from the roll of attorneys;

ORDERED that TOBIN G. NILSEN be and hereby is permanently restrained and enjoined from practicing law; and it is further

[335]*335ORDERED that TOBIN G. NILSEN comply with Rule 1:20-20 dealing with disbarred attorneys; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs and actual expenses incurred in the prosecution of this matter, as provided in Rule 1:20-17.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Coercion and enticement
18 U.S.C. § 2422(b)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
162 A.3d 289, 229 N.J. 333, 2017 WL 2598853, 2017 N.J. LEXIS 640, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-nilsen-nj-2017.