in Re Nii-Otabil Nelson

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedApril 7, 2015
Docket01-15-00313-CR
StatusPublished

This text of in Re Nii-Otabil Nelson (in Re Nii-Otabil Nelson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
in Re Nii-Otabil Nelson, (Tex. Ct. App. 2015).

Opinion

01-15-00313-CR APR-7 2015 CH»

STATE OF TEXAS § IN THE COURT OF APPEALS § vs. § FIRST DISTRICT § NII-OTABIL NELSON § HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS

EX PARTE EMERGENCY APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

SEEKING BAIL

TO THE HONORABLE JUDGE OF SAID COURT:

Now comes Nii-Otabil Nelson, Defendant, and makes this Ex-Parte Emergency

Application for Writ of Habeas Corpus Seeking Bail, and for good cause shows the following:

1. Nii-Otabil Nelson is illegally confined and restrained of his liberty by the Sheriff

of Harris County, Texas in the Harris County Jail at 701 N. San Jacinto in Houston, Texas.

Mr. Nii-Otabil Nelson has been remanded without bond pending a motion to adjudicate for the

offense of alleged violation of the terms of his probation, namely failing to complete community

service at the correct location.

2. Holding Nii-Otabil Nelson without bond under these circumstances is in violation

of the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution, Article I, §§ 11, 13

and 19 of the Texas Constitution, and Articles 1.07 and 17.15 of the Texas Code of Criminal

Procedure.

3. Nii-Otabil Nelson respectfully requests this Court to grant an evidentiary hearing

and, after receiving evidence, to release him on his own recognizance or alternatively to set a

bond in a reasonable amount in order that Nii-Otabil Nelson will have an opportunity to obtain

release from incarceration pending trial. 4. Nii-Otabil Nelson's confinement and restraint is illegal because Defendant is held

without hearing or due process for over 90 days until the time of hearing. He has no way to

prepare for the hearing regarding the alleged violation of probation while incarcerated. Further,

Defendant is a brain surgeon who has patients who direly need him. He is not a flight risk nor a

danger to society in any way, shape or form.

A capias must be supported by probable cause. See Jones v. State, 119 S.W.3d 766, 786

(Tex. Crim. App. 2003). Rickels v. State, 202 S.W.3d 759, 763 (Tex.Crim.App.2006) We

review an order revoking community supervision under an abuse of discretion standard. There

was no probable cause to issue the caspias as Defendant showed up for court when he was told

by his attorney, adhered to the terms of his probation to the best of his knowledge and has now

being detained without hearing for three months, which is unreasonable and Defendant should be

entitled to bond. He was given no notice of a capia, but was rather taken into custody

immediately upon arriving to court. He was not given any opportunity to explain why the first

setting of the alleged violation of probation was reset by his attorney.

As referenced above, Defendant is a brain surgeon and he was out of town in emergency

surgery at the time of the first setting and his attorney related that he would obtain a reset. His

attorney did indeed obtain a continuance and when Defendant arrived for court, he was not given

a hearing on the allegation of probation violation but instead the capia was issued instantly and

he was taken into custody.

Pursuant to Art. 23.04 in misdemeanor cases, the capia or summons shall issue from a

court having jurisdiction over the case. Secondly, the summons shall issue only upon the

request of the attorney representing the State and shall follow the same form and procedure as in

a felony matter. In addition to lack of probable cause and lack of procedural due process, Defendant

maintains that the Court lacked jurisdiction because an Appeal was currently pending in this

same matter and because no attorney representing the State requested the capia. The judge

issued the capia without request of the State. The Court was clearly on notice that there is an

appeal pending in this matter found in First Appellate Court Case number: 01-14-00924-CR.

Defendant is informed and believes this Appeal relates to the Court's denial of his motion for

new trial and motion to quash. Defendant was forced to request, and did indeed obtain relief,

when this same Court wrongfully incarcerated him without bond in 2014.

WHEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED, Nii-Otabil Nelson prays that this Court

grant this ex-parte emergency application and issue a Writ of Habeas Corpus to the Sheriff of

Harris County of Harris County, Texas, directing and commanding the production of Nii-Otabil

Nelson before this Court instanter, or at such time and place to be designated by this Court, then

and there to show cause, if any there may be, why Nii-Otabil Nelson should not be discharged

from such illegal confinement; or that Nii-Otabil Nelson be released on his own recognizance or

alternatively allowed bail in a reasonable amount. Nii-Otabil Nelson further prays allowance of

immediate release or alternatively bail for Nii-Otabil Nelson in a reasonable amount, conditioned

that Nii-Otabil Nelson appear at the hearing to await further orders of the Court.

Respectfully submitted,

Nii-Otabil Nelson SPN02168902 Detained 701 N. San Jacinot St. Houston, TX 77002 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

This is to certify that on April 7, 2015, a true and correct copy of the above and foregoing

document was served on the District Attorney's Office, Harris County, by certified mail, return

receipt requested.

Aimee Enriquez THE STATE OF TEXAS § COUNTY OF HARRIS §

AFFIDAVIT

BEFORE ME, the undersigned authority, on this day personally appeared Nii-Otabil

Nelson, who being by me duly sworn, upon oath deposes and says:

"I am Nii-Otabil Nelson, Defendant in this cause; I have read the above and it is true and

correct."

Nii-Otabil Nelson Affi/nt SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE ME on 7%4 tfyfrlP . 2015, to certify which witness my hand and seal of office.

sags jSwy.M* NORA EUA OUVO Notary Public, State of Texas «&}y-S\ Notary Public. State ofTexas MyCommission Expires March 14.2019 ORDER OF SETTING

On • , 2015, came on to be heard the Application of Nii-Otabil Nelson, for a

Writ of Habeas Corpus, and it appearing to the Court that Nii-Otabil Nelson is entitled to a

hearing on said Application, it is THEREFORE ORDERED that the clerk of this Court issue a

Writ of Habeas Corpus directed to the Sheriff of Harris County of Harris County, Texas, and

commanding the Sheriff of Harris County to have and produce the person of Nii-Otabil Nelson

before me in the courtroom of the Court, on , 2015,

at o'clock, then and there to show cause why the said Nii-Otabil Nelson should not

be released from custody on his own recognizance or alternatively on a reasonable bond.

Signed on .

JUDGE PRESIDING NO. 01-15-00248-CR

STATE OF TEXAS IN THE FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT § vs. § § NII-OTABIL NELSON § HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS

ORDER

On _, 2015, came on to be considered Defendant's Application for Writ of

Habeas Corpus Seeking Bail in the above styled and numbered cause, and said motion is hereby

(GRANTED) (DENIED).

It is therefore Ordered that Nii-Otabil Nelson be released on his own recognizance or

alternatively admitted to Bail in the amount of .

Signed on

STATE OF TEXAS § IN THE COURT OF APPEALS § FIRST DISTRICT vs. § § NII-OTABIL NELSON § HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS

WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

TO THE SHERIFF OF HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS:

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Rickels v. State
202 S.W.3d 759 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2006)
Jones v. State
119 S.W.3d 766 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2003)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
in Re Nii-Otabil Nelson, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-nii-otabil-nelson-texapp-2015.