In re Nicotina
This text of 37 A.D.2d 300 (In re Nicotina) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The respondent was admitted to practice in this Department on February 10, 1941. He was charged with [301]*301converting to Ms own personal use $5,000 wMch he was holding in escrow for a client pursuant to a contract of sale, and $6,409.70, being the proceeds of six promissory notes collected by him for his client. No part of said sums has ever been received by respondent’s client.
Respondent failed to file an answer to the charge; did not appear to defend himself before the Referee and did not submit any papers on this application to confirm the Referee’s report. ‘ ‘ Such inaction is not only construed to constitute an admission of the charges but also an indifference to the consequences of an adverse determination” (Matter of Schner, 5 A D 2d 599, 600).
The evidence amply sustains the charges and the report of the Referee is confirmed. Respondent should be disbarred. (Matter of Leyton, 30 A D 2d 152; Matter of Turk, 25 A D 2d 255.)
Stevens, P. J., Capozzoli, McGtvern, Steubr and Tilzer, JJ., concur.
Respondent disbarred effective November 19, 1971.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
37 A.D.2d 300, 325 N.Y.S.2d 299, 1971 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3270, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-nicotina-nyappdiv-1971.