in Re: Nicolas Boullet
This text of in Re: Nicolas Boullet (in Re: Nicolas Boullet) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Denied and Opinion Filed June 30, 2021
In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-21-00475-CV
IN RE NICOLAS BOULLET, Relator
Original Proceeding from the 302nd Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DF-19-07797
MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Schenck, Nowell, and Garcia Opinion by Justice Nowell Relator’s June 23, 2021 petition for writ of mandamus challenges the trial
court’s order granting the second amended motion for enforcement and for
sanctions. To be entitled to mandamus relief, relator must demonstrate that the trial
court has clearly abused its discretion and that he has no adequate appellate remedy.
In re Prudential Ins. Co., 148 S.W.3d 124, 135–36 (Tex. 2004) (orig. proceeding).
Based on our review of the petition and the record before us, we conclude that relator
has failed to show his entitlement to the relief requested. Accordingly, we deny the
petition for writ of mandamus. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a). Having denied the petition, we also deny relator’s motion for temporary relief
as moot.
/Erin A. Nowell// 210475f.p05 ERIN A. NOWELL JUSTICE
–2–
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re: Nicolas Boullet, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-nicolas-boullet-texapp-2021.