In Re Nicholson

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

In Re Nicholson

1925 OK CR 572, 240 P. 1117, 32 Okla. Crim. 334, 1925 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 557

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedNovember 28, 1925

DocketNo. A-5491.

StatusPublished

This text of 1925 OK CR 572 (In Re Nicholson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In Re Nicholson, 1925 OK CR 572, 240 P. 1117, 32 Okla. Crim. 334, 1925 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 557 (Okla. Ct. App. 1925).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The petition herein states that the above-named petitioner is unlawfully restrained of his liberty in Oklahoma City by Frank Boone, who represents himself to be the agent of the Governor of the state of Kansas; that such detention is under authority of an executive warrant for the arrest of the petitioner and his return to the state of Kansas for trial in a criminal action. The petitioner was admitted to bail pending further hearing on the petition. On March 19, 1925, by agreement of parties, the custody and possession of the petitioner was *335 delivered to A. F. Pyeatt, attorney for the petitioner. It is now made to appear that the matters and things in controversy have been settled to the satisfaction of all parties interested and that the petitioner is now at liberty. The application for the writ is therefore dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The petition herein states that the above-named petitioner is unlawfully restrained of his liberty in Oklahoma City by Frank Boone, who represents himself to be the agent of the Governor of the state of Kansas; that such detention is under authority of an executive warrant for the arrest of the petitioner and his return to the state of Kansas for trial in a criminal action. The petitioner was admitted to bail pending further hearing on the petition. On March 19, 1925, by agreement of parties, the custody and possession of the petitioner was *335 delivered to A. F. Pyeatt, attorney for the petitioner. It is now made to appear that the matters and things in controversy have been settled to the satisfaction of all parties interested and that the petitioner is now at liberty. The application for the writ is therefore dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1925 OK CR 572, 240 P. 1117, 32 Okla. Crim. 334, 1925 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 557, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-nicholson-oklacrimapp-1925.