In re Nicholas V.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Nicholas V.

307 A.D.2d 769, 762 N.Y.S.2d 564, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7924

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJuly 3, 2003

DocketAppeal No. 3

StatusPublished

This text of 307 A.D.2d 769 (In re Nicholas V.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Nicholas V., 307 A.D.2d 769, 762 N.Y.S.2d 564, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7924 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2003).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from those parts of an order of Family Court, Erie County (Szczur, J.), entered July 17, 2002, that adjudged that, with respect to respondent August V., Ill, Nicholas V. and Kayla V. are neglected children and placed respondent August V., Ill under the supervision of petitioner for a period of 12 months.

It is hereby ordered that the order insofar as appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously reversed on the law without costs and the petition against respondent August V., Ill with respect to Nicholas V. and Kayla V. is dismissed.

[770]*770Same memorandum as in Matter of Kenneth V. ([appeal No. 2] 307 AD2d 767 [2003]). Present — Pine, J.P., Hurlbutt, Scudder, Kehoe and Lawton, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from those parts of an order of Family Court, Erie County (Szczur, J.), entered July 17, 2002, that adjudged that, with respect to respondent August V., Ill, Nicholas V. and Kayla V. are neglected children and placed respondent August V., Ill under the supervision of petitioner for a period of 12 months.

It is hereby ordered that the order insofar as appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously reversed on the law without costs and the petition against respondent August V., Ill with respect to Nicholas V. and Kayla V. is dismissed.

[770]*770Same memorandum as in Matter of Kenneth V. ([appeal No. 2] 307 AD2d 767 [2003]). Present — Pine, J.P., Hurlbutt, Scudder, Kehoe and Lawton, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

307 A.D.2d 769, 762 N.Y.S.2d 564, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7924, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-nicholas-v-nyappdiv-2003.