In re: Nice

Hawaii Supreme Court·Decided May 27, 2026·No. SCPW-25-0000494·Published

Opinion

Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCPW-XX-XXXXXXX 27-MAY-2026 07:53 AM Dkt. 28 ODDP

SCPW-XX-XXXXXXX

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAII

IN RE CAMERON NICE AND MARTHA NICE

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING (CASE NOS. 5CCV-XX-XXXXXXX; 5CCV-XX-XXXXXXX)

ORDER DENYING PETITION (By: McKenna, Acting C.J., Eddins, and Ginoza, JJ., and Circuit Judge Remigio, in place of Devens, C.J., recused, and Circuit Judge Hamman, assigned by reason of vacancy)

Upon consideration of Petitioners filings herein seeking a petition for writ of mandamus, and the record, Petitioners have not demonstrated a clear and indisputable right to relief. See Womble Bond Dickinson (US) LLP v. Kim, 153 Hawaiʻi 307, 319, 537 P.3d 1154, 1166 (2023). It is ordered that the petition is denied. DATED: Honolulu, Hawaiʻi, May 27, 2026. /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna /s/ Todd W. Eddins /s/ Lisa M. Ginoza /s/ Catherine H. Remigio /s/ Kirstin M. Hamman

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re: Nice, (haw 2026).

In re: Nice (In re: Nice) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Womble Bond Dickinson v. Kim
537 P.3d 1154 (Hawaii Supreme Court, 2023)