In re: Nice
Opinion
Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCPW-XX-XXXXXXX 27-MAY-2026 07:53 AM Dkt. 28 ODDP
SCPW-XX-XXXXXXX
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAII
IN RE CAMERON NICE AND MARTHA NICE
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING (CASE NOS. 5CCV-XX-XXXXXXX; 5CCV-XX-XXXXXXX)
ORDER DENYING PETITION (By: McKenna, Acting C.J., Eddins, and Ginoza, JJ., and Circuit Judge Remigio, in place of Devens, C.J., recused, and Circuit Judge Hamman, assigned by reason of vacancy)
Upon consideration of Petitioners filings herein seeking a petition for writ of mandamus, and the record, Petitioners have not demonstrated a clear and indisputable right to relief. See Womble Bond Dickinson (US) LLP v. Kim, 153 Hawaiʻi 307, 319, 537 P.3d 1154, 1166 (2023). It is ordered that the petition is denied. DATED: Honolulu, Hawaiʻi, May 27, 2026. /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna /s/ Todd W. Eddins /s/ Lisa M. Ginoza /s/ Catherine H. Remigio /s/ Kirstin M. Hamman
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
In re: Nice (In re: Nice) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.