In re: Nice
This text of In re: Nice (In re: Nice) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Hawaii Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCPW-XX-XXXXXXX 27-MAY-2026 07:53 AM Dkt. 28 ODDP
SCPW-XX-XXXXXXX
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAII
IN RE CAMERON NICE AND MARTHA NICE
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING (CASE NOS. 5CCV-XX-XXXXXXX; 5CCV-XX-XXXXXXX)
ORDER DENYING PETITION (By: McKenna, Acting C.J., Eddins, and Ginoza, JJ., and Circuit Judge Remigio, in place of Devens, C.J., recused, and Circuit Judge Hamman, assigned by reason of vacancy)
Upon consideration of Petitioners filings herein seeking a petition for writ of mandamus, and the record, Petitioners have not demonstrated a clear and indisputable right to relief. See Womble Bond Dickinson (US) LLP v. Kim, 153 Hawaiʻi 307, 319, 537 P.3d 1154, 1166 (2023). It is ordered that the petition is denied. DATED: Honolulu, Hawaiʻi, May 27, 2026. /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna /s/ Todd W. Eddins /s/ Lisa M. Ginoza /s/ Catherine H. Remigio /s/ Kirstin M. Hamman
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
In re: Nice, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-nice-haw-2026.