in Re N.H., N.H. and N.H.
This text of in Re N.H., N.H. and N.H. (in Re N.H., N.H. and N.H.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
NO. 03-09-00677-CV
In re N.H., N.H. and N.H.
FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 3 OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY
NO. 04-1241-FC3, HONORABLE TAMARA ARRINGTON, JUDGE PRESIDING
Appellant Esmeralda Ramahi filed a notice of appeal on May 29, 2009. On September 21, 2009, this Court received notice that Ramahi had failed to pay for the clerk's record. On December 2, 2009, this Court sent Ramahi notice informing her that her appeal would be dismissed for want of prosecution if she failed to pay for the record and ordering her to submit a status report to this Court by December 14, 2009. To date, Ramahi has not responded to this Court's notice or made arrangements to pay for the record. Accordingly, we dismiss her appeal for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b), 42.3(b).
J. Woodfin Jones, Chief Justice
Before Chief Justice Jones, Justices Pemberton and Waldrop
Dismissed for Want of Prosecution
Filed: January 29, 2010
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re N.H., N.H. and N.H., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-nh-nh-and-nh-texapp-2010.