In Re Nguyen
This text of 226 B.R. 547 (In Re Nguyen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Virginia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In re Quy Van NGUYEN, Debtor.
United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Virginia, Alexandria Division.
*548 M. Christian Orndorff, Falls Church, VA, for Debtor.
Robert G. Mayer, Trustee.
MEMORANDUM OPINION
MARTIN V.B. BOSTETTER, Jr., Chief Judge.
We determine here whether to sustain trustee's objection to debtor's claimed homestead exemption. The issue concerns whether debtor timely had his homestead deed admitted to record as required by Virginia law. After hearing arguments, the Court *549 held that debtor properly filed his homestead deed and it was admitted to record within the requisite time period.
The Court possesses jurisdiction over the parties and subject matter of this core proceeding pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 157(a), 157(b)(1), 157(b)(2)(I) and 157(b)(2)(J). Venue is proper under 28 U.S.C. § 1409.
Quy Van Nguyen ("debtor") filed his voluntary Chapter 7 bankruptcy petition on August 29, 1997. Debtor listed in his Schedule B, and claimed as exempt, an automobile worth $6,000. He claimed a $2,000 exemption under Virginia Code § 34-26(8) and a $4,000 exemption pursuant to Virginia Code § 34-4. VA.CODE ANN. §§ 34-26(8), 34-4. Debtor's $4,000 claim of exemption is at issue in this case.
The first meeting of creditors was scheduled for October 1, 1997. Debtor mailed his homestead deed by United States Postal Service priority mail to the Fairfax County Circuit Court. The clerk received and signed for the package on Friday, October 3, 1997. However, the clerk did not record debtor's homestead deed until Tuesday, October 7, 1997, one day after § 34-17's five-day statutory limit. VA.CODE ANN. § 34-17.
As a result, trustee claims debtor failed to have his homestead deed properly admitted to record within the five-day time limit. Debtor urges the Court to find that his homestead deed was admitted to record upon being delivered to the clerk of court. The Court therefore must determine what constitutes "admitted to record" under Virginia law.
The Bankruptcy Code allows a debtor to exempt real and personal property from property of the estate. 11 U.S.C. § 522. As Virginia has opted out of the federal exemption scheme, Virginia law governs the property a debtor may claim as exempt. VA.CODE ANN. § 34-3.1; In re Heater, 189 B.R. 629, 632 (Bankr.E.D.Va. 1995). Virginia's "homestead exemption" permits a debtor to exempt $5,000 of real or personal property by filing a homestead deed in the appropriate circuit court clerk's office. VA.CODE ANN. § 34-4.[1] A debtor desiring to exempt personal property must file a homestead deed adequately describing the property, which then "shall be admitted to record to be recorded as deeds are recorded, in the county or city wherein such householder resides." VA.CODE ANN. § 34-14; Heater, 189 B.R. at 632.
When a debtor files for bankruptcy, debtor must "set apart" the homestead exemption no later than five days after the first date set for the meeting of creditors in the bankruptcy case. VA.CODE ANN. §§ 34-17; 34-14.[2] "Setting apart" includes admitting the homestead deed to record. Only after a homestead deed is properly admitted to record does the clerk's duty arise to record it in the deed book. United States v. Lomas Mortgage, USA, Inc., 742 F.Supp. 936, 939 (W.D.Va.1990); Jones v. Folks, 149 Va. 140, 140 S.E. 126, 127 (Va.1927); Davis v. Beazley, 75 Va. 491, 495 (1881). Failing to strictly *550 comply with these requirements will result in the loss of that exemption in bankruptcy. Zimmerman v. Morgan, 689 F.2d 471, 472 (4th Cir.1982); In re Franklin, 214 B.R. 826, 830 (Bankr.E.D.Va.1997).
This district recently dealt with what constitutes "admitted to record" in In re Franklin. Franklin, 214 B.R. at 826. In Franklin, the Court held a combined hearing on two cases bearing essentially identical facts to those in the case at bar. In both those cases, debtors sent their homestead deeds by Federal Express on the same day they were due under Virginia law. The parties stipulated at trial that the clerk's office received both homestead deeds within the five-day period. Id.
The trustee objected to debtors' claimed exemptions in the two cases on the grounds that the clerk's stamped certificate on the homestead deed reflected the following day as the recordation date. The Court sustained trustee's objections finding that "mere arrival [of the homestead deed] at the courthouse is not sufficient." Franklin, 214 B.R. at 833. Though we agree with Franklin's comprehensive analysis of the law, we disagree with its holding where debtor has done everything necessary to preserve his rights to exempt property under the statute.
The Virginia Code requires debtor's homestead deed to be recorded as any other deed. VA.CODE ANN. § 34-13. Virginia Code § 17-59 governs records, recordation and indexing, which states:
Every writing authorized by law to be recorded . . . upon payment of fees for the same and the tax thereon, if any, shall, when admitted to record, be recorded by or under the direction of the clerk on such media as prescribed by § 17-70. However, the clerk may refuse to accept any writing for filing or recordation [if certain requirements, not relevant here, are not met.] However, if the writing or deed is accepted for record and spread on the deed books, it shall be deemed to be validly recorded for all purposes. . . . Upon admitting any such writing or other paper to record the clerk shall endorse thereon the day and time of day of such recordation.
VA.CODE ANN. § 17-59.
A careful reading of the statute's plain language indicates that recordation of a deed involves it first being admitted to record and then spread on the deed books. Franklin, 214 B.R. at 830. The statute also makes clear that once debtor has properly presented the deed for recordation, the clerk "shall" endorse the day and time on the writing in order to admit it to record. VA. CODE ANN. § 17-59; see Franklin, 214 B.R. at 830; Fooshee v. Snavely, 58 F.2d 772, 774 (W.D.Va.1931), aff'd, 58 F.2d 774 (4th Cir.); cert. denied, 287 U.S. 635, 53 S.Ct. 85, 77 L.Ed. 550 (1932) (admitting to record is not a mere mental act, but requires the physical act of indorsing the day and time of admission).
The case law further supports this reading of Virginia statutory law. The Fourth Circuit stated in Fooshee v. Snavely in dicta that a properly presented deed for recordation requires the clerk to at once admit it to record. Fooshee, 58 F.2d at 777 (emphasis added); In re Smith, 256 F.Supp.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
226 B.R. 547, 1998 WL 774484, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-nguyen-vaeb-1998.