In re Ng

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Ng

267 A.D.2d 768, 700 N.Y.S.2d 761, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13570

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 20, 1999

StatusPublished

This text of 267 A.D.2d 768 (In re Ng) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Ng, 267 A.D.2d 768, 700 N.Y.S.2d 761, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13570 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

—Per Curiam.

By decision dated June 11, 1998, respondent was suspended by this Court for a period of one year, effective immediately (251 AD2d 810). He now applies for reinstatement.

Our examination of the papers submitted on this application indicates that respondent has substantially complied with the [769]*769provisions of the orders which suspended him and with this Court’s rule (22 NYCRR 806.9) regarding the conduct of suspended lawyers. We are also satisfied that he has complied with the requirements of this Court’s rule (22 NYCRR 806.12) regarding reinstatement and that he possesses the requisite character and fitness to resume the practice of law. Petitioner, the Committee on Professional Standards, has advised that it does not oppose the application.

Accordingly, the application is granted and respondent is . reinstated to the practice of law, effective immediately.

Mikoll, J. P., Mercure, Crew III, Yesawich Jr. and Mugglin, JJ., concur. Ordered that respondent’s application is granted and he is reinstated as an attorney and counselor-at-law in the State of New York, effective immediately.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Per Curiam.

By decision dated June 11, 1998, respondent was suspended by this Court for a period of one year, effective immediately (251 AD2d 810). He now applies for reinstatement.

Our examination of the papers submitted on this application indicates that respondent has substantially complied with the [769]*769provisions of the orders which suspended him and with this Court’s rule (22 NYCRR 806.9) regarding the conduct of suspended lawyers. We are also satisfied that he has complied with the requirements of this Court’s rule (22 NYCRR 806.12) regarding reinstatement and that he possesses the requisite character and fitness to resume the practice of law. Petitioner, the Committee on Professional Standards, has advised that it does not oppose the application.

Accordingly, the application is granted and respondent is . reinstated to the practice of law, effective immediately.

Mikoll, J. P., Mercure, Crew III, Yesawich Jr. and Mugglin, JJ., concur. Ordered that respondent’s application is granted and he is reinstated as an attorney and counselor-at-law in the State of New York, effective immediately.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

267 A.D.2d 768, 700 N.Y.S.2d 761, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13570, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-ng-nyappdiv-1999.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack