In Re Newton

722 S.E.2d 800, 396 S.C. 513, 2012 S.C. LEXIS 38
CourtSupreme Court of South Carolina
DecidedFebruary 14, 2012
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 722 S.E.2d 800 (In Re Newton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In Re Newton, 722 S.E.2d 800, 396 S.C. 513, 2012 S.C. LEXIS 38 (S.C. 2012).

Opinion

ORDER

The Office of Disciplinary Counsel petitions the Court to either place respondent on interim suspension or to transfer *514 him to incapacity inactive status pursuant to Rule 17(b), RLDE, Rule 413, SCACR.

IT IS ORDERED that respondent is transferred to incapacity inactive status until further order of this Court.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Peter Brandt Shelbourne, Esquire, is hereby appointed to assume responsibility for respondent’s client files, trust account(s), escrow accounts), operating account(s), and any other law office accounts) respondent may maintain. Mr. Shelbourne shall take action as required by Rule 31, RLDE, Rule 413, SCACR, to protect the interests of respondent’s clients. Mr. Shelbourne may make disbursements from respondent’s trust account(s), escrow account(s), operating account(s), and any other law office account(s) respondent may maintain that are necessary to effectuate this appointment.

This Order, when served on any bank or other financial institution maintaining trust, escrow and/or operating accounts of respondent, shall serve as an injunction to prevent respondent from making withdrawals from the account(s) and shall further serve as notice to the bank or other financial institution that Peter Brandt Shelbourne, Esquire, has been duly appointed by this Court.

Finally, this Order, when served on any office of the United States Postal Service, shall serve as notice that Peter Brandt Shelbourne, Esquire, has been duly appointed by this Court and has the authority to receive respondent’s mail and the authority to direct that respondent’s mail be delivered to Mr. Shelbourne’s office.

This appointment shall be for a period of no longer than nine months unless request is made to this Court for an extension.

/s/Jean H. Toal, C.J.

FOR THE COURT

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In Re Mayer
722 S.E.2d 800 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 2012)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
722 S.E.2d 800, 396 S.C. 513, 2012 S.C. LEXIS 38, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-newton-sc-2012.