in Re: Newton B. Schwartz
This text of in Re: Newton B. Schwartz (in Re: Newton B. Schwartz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Petition for Writ of Mandamus Denied and Memorandum Opinion filed May 12, 2005.
In The
Fourteenth Court of Appeals
____________
NO. 14-05-00434-CV
IN RE NEWTON B. SCHWARTZ, SR., Relator
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING
WRIT OF MANDAMUS
M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N
On May 4, 2005, relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus in this court. See Tex. Gov=t. Code Ann. ' 22.221 (Vernon 2004); see also Tex. R. App. P. 52. Relator complains of the trial court=s failure to rule on objections to evidence supporting the motion for partial summary judgment of real party in interest, and the trial court=s denial of severance. Relator also complains of several issues already raised in appellant=s pending appeal.
Because we find relator has an adequate remedy by appeal, relator is not entitled to mandamus relief. Accordingly, we deny relator=s petition for writ of mandamus.
PER CURIAM
Petition Denied and Memorandum Opinion filed May 12, 2005.
Panel consists of Justices Yates, Anderson, and Hudson.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re: Newton B. Schwartz, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-newton-b-schwartz-texapp-2005.