In re Newman

781 S.E.2d 355, 415 S.C. 239, 2016 S.C. LEXIS 20
CourtSupreme Court of South Carolina
DecidedJanuary 8, 2016
DocketAppellate Nos. 2016-000026, 2016-000027
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 781 S.E.2d 355 (In re Newman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Newman, 781 S.E.2d 355, 415 S.C. 239, 2016 S.C. LEXIS 20 (S.C. 2016).

Opinion

ORDER

The Office of Disciplinary Counsel petitions this Court to place respondent on interim suspension pursuant to Rule 17 of the Rules for Lawyer Disciplinary Enforcement (RLDE) contained in Rule 413 of the South Carolina Appellate Court Rules (SCACR). The petition also seeks appointment of the Receiver pursuant to Rule 31, RLDE, Rule 413, SCACR. Respondent consents to his interim suspension and the appointment of the Receiver.

IT IS ORDERED that respondent’s license to practice law in this state is suspended until further order of this Court.

Respondent is hereby enjoined from taking any action regarding any trust, escrow, operating, and any other law office account(s) respondent may maintain at any bank or other financial institution including, but not limited to, making any withdrawal or transfer, or writing any check or other instrument on the account(s).

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Receiver, Peyre T. Lumpkin, Esquire, is hereby appointed to assume responsibility for respondent’s client files, trust account(s), escrow accounts), operating account(s), and any other law office accounts respondent may maintain. Mr. Lumpkin shall take action as required by Rule 31, RLDE, Rule 413, SCACR, to protect the interests of respondent’s clients. Mr. Lumpkin may make disbursements from respondent’s trust account(s), escrow account(s), operating account(s), and any other law office accounts respondent may maintain that are necessary to effectuate this appointment. Respondent shall promptly respond to Mr. Lumpkin’s requests for information and/or documentation and shall fully cooperate with Mr. Lumpkin in all other respects.

[240]*240Further, this Order, when served on any bank or other financial institution maintaining trust, escrow and/or operating account(s) of respondent, shall serve as an injunction to prevent respondent from making withdrawals from the account(s) and shall further serve as notice to the bank or other financial institution that Mr. Lumpkin has been duly appointed by this Court.

This Order, when served on any office of the United States Postal Service, shall serve as notice that Peyre T. Lumpkin, Esquire, has been duly appointed by this Court and has the authority to receive respondent’s mail and the authority to direct that respondent’s mail be delivered to Mr. Lumpkin’s office.

Mr. Lumpkin’s appointment shall be for a period of no longer than nine months unless an extension of the period of appointment is requested.

Finally, within fifteen (15) days of the date of this order, respondent shall serve and file the affidavit required by Rule 30, RLDE. Should respondent fail to timely file the required affidavit, respondent may be held in civil and/or criminal contempt of this Court as provided by Rule 30, RLDE.

s/Costa M. Pleicones

Costa M. Pleicones

Chief Justice of South Carolina

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re Brian Dequincey Newman
821 S.E.2d 689 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 2018)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
781 S.E.2d 355, 415 S.C. 239, 2016 S.C. LEXIS 20, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-newman-sc-2016.