In re Newman

141 A.D.2d 25, 532 N.Y.S.2d 501, 1988 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9198

This text of 141 A.D.2d 25 (In re Newman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Newman, 141 A.D.2d 25, 532 N.Y.S.2d 501, 1988 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9198 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1988).

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Per Curiam.

The respondent was admitted to practice by this court on March 25, 1959. By order of this court dated August 11, 1987, the respondent was suspended from the practice of law pending the outcome of a disciplinary proceeding.

On March 15, 1988, the respondent pleaded guilty in the [26]*26Supreme Court, Westchester County, to grand larceny in the third degree, a class E felony under Penal Law former § 155.30, in effect at the time the offense was committed.

Pursuant to Judiciary Law § 90 (4), the respondent ceased to be an attorney and counselor-at-law upon his conviction of a felony.

Accordingly, the petitioner’s motion is granted. The respondent is disbarred and the clerk of the court is directed to strike his name from the roll of attorneys and counselors-at-law forthwith.

Mollen, P. J., Mangano, Thompson, Bracken and Brown, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

§ 90
New York JUD § 90(4)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
141 A.D.2d 25, 532 N.Y.S.2d 501, 1988 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9198, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-newman-nyappdiv-1988.