In re Newell

208 A.D. 496, 203 N.Y.S. 677, 1924 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5071
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMarch 26, 1924
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 208 A.D. 496 (In re Newell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Newell, 208 A.D. 496, 203 N.Y.S. 677, 1924 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5071 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1924).

Opinion

Per Curiam:

On the 6th day of July, 1916, the petitioner, James E. Newell, was disbarred by an order of this court for misconduct which fully justified the order.

The proofs now before us show that following the granting of the order of disbarment he unquestioningly submitted thereto and has ever since faithfully observed the limitations thereby imposed upon him. He has endeavored to earn his livelihood since then in an honest and honorable fashion and now at the age of sixty-five years has petitioned this court to be restored to the office of attorney and counselor at law.

The petition is supported by the recommendation of trial justices in his judicial department, judicial officers of his county and city, and a large majority of the bar of Onondaga county, as well as by the recommendation of the Onondaga County Bar Association, expressed in a resolution adopted by its board of directors. No one has appeared directly or indirectly in opposition.

Without overlooking the seriousness of his offenses, but talcing into consideration the lapse of time and the honorable record of his life since the granting of the order of disbarment, we believe the order has now fulfilled its purpose and we have determined to grant the petition and restore the petitioner to the office of attorney and counselor at law.

All concur.

Application for reinstatement granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Scanlon
15 A.D.2d 566 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1961)
Ex Parte Marshall
147 So. 791 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1933)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
208 A.D. 496, 203 N.Y.S. 677, 1924 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5071, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-newell-nyappdiv-1924.