In re New York World's Fair 1964-1965 Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re New York World's Fair 1964-1965 Corp.

30 A.D.2d 928, 294 N.Y.S.2d 80, 1968 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3263

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedSeptember 30, 1968

StatusPublished

This text of 30 A.D.2d 928 (In re New York World's Fair 1964-1965 Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re New York World's Fair 1964-1965 Corp., 30 A.D.2d 928, 294 N.Y.S.2d 80, 1968 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3263 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1968).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by petitioners from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated June 10, 1968, as permitted respondents to file a late notice of claim. Order affirmed insofar as appealed from, with $20 costs and disbursements. In our opinion, the Special Term has inherent power to permit the filing of a claim after the expiration of the time fixed therefor in an order obtained pursuant to section 56 of the Membership Corporations Law (cf. People ex rel. [929]*929Attorney-General v. Security Life Ins. & Annuity Co., 79 N. Y. 267, 272); and we find no abuse of discretion in the exercise of that power here. Beldock, P. J., Christ, Brennan, Benjamin and Martuscello, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by petitioners from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated June 10, 1968, as permitted respondents to file a late notice of claim. Order affirmed insofar as appealed from, with $20 costs and disbursements. In our opinion, the Special Term has inherent power to permit the filing of a claim after the expiration of the time fixed therefor in an order obtained pursuant to section 56 of the Membership Corporations Law (cf. People ex rel. [929]*929Attorney-General v. Security Life Ins. & Annuity Co., 79 N. Y. 267, 272); and we find no abuse of discretion in the exercise of that power here. Beldock, P. J., Christ, Brennan, Benjamin and Martuscello, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

30 A.D.2d 928, 294 N.Y.S.2d 80, 1968 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3263, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-new-york-worlds-fair-1964-1965-corp-nyappdiv-1968.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack