In re New York Telephone Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re New York Telephone Co.

264 A.D. 937, 36 N.Y.S.2d 263, 1942 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5422

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided July 1, 1942·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Judgment affirmed, with costs. Memorandum: We concur in the reasoning of the official referee as outlined in his decision. Appellant’s contention under point 9 of its brief that subdivision 6 of section 2 of the Tax Law is not applicable to property assessed by the city of Syracuse was apparently not urged before [938]*938the trial court. We have examined appellant’s contention in that regard and we conclude that the term “ real property ” for the purpose of taxation is governed by subdivision 6 of section 2 of the Tax Law. AIL concur. (The judgment confirms the report of the official referee and dismisses the petition, in a proceeding to compel defendant to strike from the 1941 assessment roll an item of $700,000 on station apparatus, station installations and private branch exchanges owned by petitioner and located on property not belonging to it in the city of Syracuse. The order is the order of confirmation.) Present — Crosby, P. J., Cunningham, Taylor, Harris and MeCurn, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment affirmed, with costs. Memorandum: We concur in the reasoning of the official referee as outlined in his decision. Appellant’s contention under point 9 of its brief that subdivision 6 of section 2 of the Tax Law is not applicable to property assessed by the city of Syracuse was apparently not urged before [938]*938the trial court. We have examined appellant’s contention in that regard and we conclude that the term “ real property ” for the purpose of taxation is governed by subdivision 6 of section 2 of the Tax Law. AIL concur. (The judgment confirms the report of the official referee and dismisses the petition, in a proceeding to compel defendant to strike from the 1941 assessment roll an item of $700,000 on station apparatus, station installations and private branch exchanges owned by petitioner and located on property not belonging to it in the city of Syracuse. The order is the order of confirmation.) Present — Crosby, P. J., Cunningham, Taylor, Harris and MeCurn, JJ.

In re New York Telephone Co., 264 A.D. 937, 36 N.Y.S.2d 263, 1942 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5422 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1942).

Pincite

264 A.D. 937 (In re New York Telephone Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related