In re New York

112 So. 2d 837, 1959 Fla. LEXIS 1678
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided June 10, 1959·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The judgment of this court was entered 22 January 1958, 100 So.2d 149, affirming the decree of the Circuit Court of the Eleventh Judicial Circuit, 9 Fla.Supp. 153, in the above styled cause. On petition for writ of certiorari the judgment was reversed and the cause remanded by the Supreme Court of the United States in an opinion filed March 2, 1959.

Upon reconsideration, therefore, the cause is remanded to the Circuit Court of the Eleventh Judicial Circuit for further proceedings consistent with the law of the State of Florida and the mandate and opinion of the Supreme Court of the United States, and it is

Ordered that the People of the State of New York shall have and recover their costs of $395.57 taxed by the Supreme Court of the United States, as well as their costs expended in this court in the appeal of this cause, and that judgment for those amounts be entered in the Circuit Court of the Eleventh Judicial Circuit against Joseph C. O’Neill and that execution issue therefor.

TERRELL, C. J., and THOMAS, HOB-SON, THORNAL and O’CONNELL, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re New York, 112 So. 2d 837, 1959 Fla. LEXIS 1678 (Fla. 1959).

112 So. 2d 837 (In re New York) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In re O'Neill
17 Fla. Supp. 199 (Miami-Dade County Circuit Court, 1960)
Clermont-Minneola Country Club, Inc. v. Loblaw
143 So. 129 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1932)
Clermont-Minneola Country Club, Inc. v. Coupland
143 So. 133 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1932)
Tilton v. Horton
137 So. 142 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1931)
Norris Et Ux. v. Eikenberry
137 So. 128 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1931)