Home/Louisiana Court of Appeal/In re New Orleans Train Car Leakage Fire Litigation

In re New Orleans Train Car Leakage Fire Litigation

794 So. 2d 954, 2000 La.App. 4 Cir. 0479, 2001 La. App. LEXIS 1861, 2001 WL 878884
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in In re New Orleans Train Car Leakage Fire Litigation. Read the opinion of the Court — 2000 La.App. 4 Cir. 0479 →
Louisiana Court of Appeal·Decided August 1, 2001·No. No. 2000-CA-0479·Published

Opinion

ON APPLICATION FOR REHEARING

JOAN BERNARD ARMSTRONG, Judge.

The application for rehearing of AMF-BRD, Inc. (“AMF BRD”) is denied. As AMF-BRD was the fabricator of the tank, it was the duty of AMF-BRD, not NACC, to apply the warning to the tank.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re New Orleans Train Car Leakage Fire Litigation, 794 So. 2d 954, 2000 La.App. 4 Cir. 0479, 2001 La. App. LEXIS 1861, 2001 WL 878884 (La. Ct. App. 2001).

794 So. 2d 954 (In re New Orleans Train Car Leakage Fire Litigation) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.