In re New England Breeders' Club

165 F. 517, 1908 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 173
District Court, D. New Hampshire·Decided September 22, 1908·No. No. 1,253·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ALDRICH, District Judge.

I hold the impression that the facts found by the master, that the Breeders’ Club, at the time of the adjudication, was not principally engaged in trading or mercantile pursuits, and that it was never to any extent engaged in such pursuits, present a situation of absolute lack of jurisdiction, and that such lack of jurisdiction cannot be cured by laches, waiver, or estoppel, even as against a petitioner who has no interest in raising the jurisdictional question. 1 therefore do not pass upon either the questions of fact [518] involved in the claim of waiver, estoppel, or laches, nor upon the question of the legal or equitable interest of the Hub Construction Company.

The proceedings are dismissed. . The trustee in bankruptcy excepts, and the execution of this order is stayed pending review.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re New England Breeders' Club, 165 F. 517, 1908 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 173 (D.N.H. 1908).

165 F. 517 (In re New England Breeders' Club) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In re Hudson River Electric Co.
167 F. 986 (N.D. New York, 1909)