In re Neville for Writ of Habeas Corpus Ad Prosequendum

551 N.E.2d 955, 49 Ohio St. 3d 223, 1990 Ohio LEXIS 96
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided March 7, 1990·No. No. 89-1729·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The judgment of the Court of Appeals for Columbiana County is affirmed on authority of In repetition of Brown (1990), 49 Ohio St. 3d 222, 551 N.E. 2d 954.

Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Holmes, Douglas, Wright, H. Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Neville for Writ of Habeas Corpus Ad Prosequendum, 551 N.E.2d 955, 49 Ohio St. 3d 223, 1990 Ohio LEXIS 96 (Ohio 1990).

551 N.E.2d 955 (In re Neville for Writ of Habeas Corpus Ad Prosequendum) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Randy Neville v. Arthur Tate, Jr.
956 F.2d 270 (Sixth Circuit, 1992)