In re Neville for Writ of Habeas Corpus Ad Prosequendum
551 N.E.2d 955, 49 Ohio St. 3d 223, 1990 Ohio LEXIS 96
This text of 551 N.E.2d 955 (In re Neville for Writ of Habeas Corpus Ad Prosequendum) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
In re Neville for Writ of Habeas Corpus Ad Prosequendum, 551 N.E.2d 955, 49 Ohio St. 3d 223, 1990 Ohio LEXIS 96 (Ohio 1990).
Opinion
The judgment of the Court of Appeals for Columbiana County is affirmed on authority of In repetition of Brown (1990), 49 Ohio St. 3d 222, 551 N.E. 2d 954.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Randy Neville v. Arthur Tate, Jr.
956 F.2d 270 (Sixth Circuit, 1992)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
551 N.E.2d 955, 49 Ohio St. 3d 223, 1990 Ohio LEXIS 96, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-neville-for-writ-of-habeas-corpus-ad-prosequendum-ohio-1990.