In re Nevada-Utah Mines & Smelters Corp.

204 F. 982, 123 C.C.A. 304, 1913 U.S. App. LEXIS 1379
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·Decided April 22, 1913·No. No. 108·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The petitioner for a revision of the order of the District Court has filed an application for a rehearing of this cause, which we disposed of on January 13, 1913. We see no reason to change our opinion, and the petition for rehearing is dismissed.

Another stockholder asks to be allowed to intervene as a party to the proceeding. Our mandate has been transmitted to the District Court, which has acted upon it. We have decided not to ask for .a return of the mandate for the purpose of a rehearing. The cause is no longer in this court, and the application made here to intervene is denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Nevada-Utah Mines & Smelters Corp., 204 F. 982, 123 C.C.A. 304, 1913 U.S. App. LEXIS 1379 (2d Cir. 1913).

204 F. 982 (In re Nevada-Utah Mines & Smelters Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Meredith v. Fair
306 F.2d 374 (Fifth Circuit, 1962)