in Re Nestle Water North America, Inc. and Robert Lee Sewell, Sr.
Opinion
Petition for Writ of Mandamus Denied and Memorandum Opinion filed December 21, 2021.
In The
Fourteenth Court of Appeals
NO. 14-21-00334-CV NO. 14-21-00335-CV
IN RE NESTLE WATER NORTH AMERICA, INC., AND ROBERT LEE SEWELL, SR., Relators
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING WRIT OF MANDAMUS Probate Court No. 4 Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 476,731-401 & Cause No. 476,827-401
MEMORANDUM OPINION
On June 17, 2021, relators Nestle Water North America, Inc., and Robert Lee Sewell, Sr. filed a petition for writ of mandamus in this Court. See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 22.221; see also Tex. R. App. P. 52. In the petition, relators ask this Court to compel the Honorable James Horwitz, presiding judge of the Probate Court No. 4 of Harris County, to set aside the June 11, 2021, Order to Produce Records in Response to Deposition by Written Questions after In Camera Inspection. Relators claim the trial court abused its discretion in ordering production of relator Robert Lee Sewell, Sr.’s medical records.
Relators have not established that they are entitled to mandamus relief. Accordingly, we deny relators’ petition for writ of mandamus.
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Chief Justice Christopher and Justices Jewell and Poissant.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
in Re Nestle Water North America, Inc. and Robert Lee Sewell, Sr. (in Re Nestle Water North America, Inc. and Robert Lee Sewell, Sr.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.