In re Nesbitt
This text of 668 F. App'x 38 (In re Nesbitt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Julius Nesbitt petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging that the district court has unduly delayed acting on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion. He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. Our review of the district court’s docket reveals that the district court recently took significant action on Nesbitt’s 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion. Accordingly, we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis and deny the mandamus petition. We dispense with oral argument because [39]*39the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
668 F. App'x 38, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-nesbitt-ca4-2016.