In re Nesbitt

Third Circuit

In re Nesbitt

461 F. App'x 97

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit

DecidedFebruary 8, 2012

DocketNo. 12-1159

StatusPublished

This text of 461 F. App'x 97 (In re Nesbitt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Nesbitt, 461 F. App'x 97 (3d Cir. 2012).

Pincite

Opinion

OPINION

PER CURIAM.

On January 24, 2012, Brenneis Alister Nesbitt filed a petition for writ of mandamus requesting that we direct the District Court to rule on a motion that he had filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. On that same day, the District Court ruled on Nes-bitt’s § 2255 motion. In light of the District Court’s action, the question Nesbitt presented is no longer a live controversy, so we will deny the petition as moot. See, e.g., Lusardi v. Xerox Corp., 975 F.2d 964, 974 (3d Cir.1992).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OPINION

PER CURIAM.

On January 24, 2012, Brenneis Alister Nesbitt filed a petition for writ of mandamus requesting that we direct the District Court to rule on a motion that he had filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. On that same day, the District Court ruled on Nes-bitt’s § 2255 motion. In light of the District Court’s action, the question Nesbitt presented is no longer a live controversy, so we will deny the petition as moot. See, e.g., Lusardi v. Xerox Corp., 975 F.2d 964, 974 (3d Cir.1992).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

461 F. App'x 97, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-nesbitt-ca3-2012.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack