In re Neroni

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Neroni

198 A.D.2d 715, 605 N.Y.S.2d 969

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 23, 1993

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 198 A.D.2d 715 (In re Neroni) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Neroni, 198 A.D.2d 715, 605 N.Y.S.2d 969 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

By decision dated October 6, 1992, respondent was suspended by this Court for a period of six months, effective September 18, 1992 (see, Matter of Neroni, 186 AD2d 860 and 185 AD2d 1015). He now applies for reinstatement.

Our examination of the papers submitted on this application indicate that respondent has substantially complied with the provisions of section 806.9 of the Court’s rules [22 NYCRR 806.9] regarding the conduct of suspended lawyers and has complied with the requirements of section 806.12 regarding reinstatement. Accordingly, respondent’s application is granted and he is reinstated to the practice of law, effective immediately.

[716]*716Mikoll, P. J., Yesawich Jr., Mercure, Crew III and White, JJ., concur. Ordered that respondent’s application is granted and he is reinstated as an attorney and counselor-at-law in the State of New York, effective immediately.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

By decision dated October 6, 1992, respondent was suspended by this Court for a period of six months, effective September 18, 1992 (see, Matter of Neroni, 186 AD2d 860 and 185 AD2d 1015). He now applies for reinstatement.

Our examination of the papers submitted on this application indicate that respondent has substantially complied with the provisions of section 806.9 of the Court’s rules [22 NYCRR 806.9] regarding the conduct of suspended lawyers and has complied with the requirements of section 806.12 regarding reinstatement. Accordingly, respondent’s application is granted and he is reinstated to the practice of law, effective immediately.

[716]*716Mikoll, P. J., Yesawich Jr., Mercure, Crew III and White, JJ., concur. Ordered that respondent’s application is granted and he is reinstated as an attorney and counselor-at-law in the State of New York, effective immediately.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

198 A.D.2d 715, 605 N.Y.S.2d 969, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-neroni-nyappdiv-1993.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack